Advertisement

Archive

Associations between the concurrent use of clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry and the rates of appropriate prescribing at discharge

Journal:Applied Clinical Informatics
ISSN:1869-0327
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-11-RA-0068
Issue:Vol. 3: Issue 2 2012
Pages:186-196

Archive
Issue
Article
References

  1. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348 (25): 2526-2534. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa020847
  2. Eslami S, de Keizer NF, Abu-Hanna A. The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients - a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77 (6): 365-376. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.001
  3. Mahoney CD, Beard-Collins CM, Coleman R, Amaral JF, Cotter CM. Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multihospital setting. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2007; 64: 1969-1977. DOI:10.2146/ajhp060617
  4. Shamliyan TA, Duval S, Du J, Kane RL. Just what the doctor ordered. Review of the evidence of the impact of computerized physician order entry system on medication errors. Health Serv Res 2008; 43 (1 Pt 1): 32-53. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00751.x
  5. Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Powe NR. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169 (2): 108-114. DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.520
  6. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeil C, Zheng J, Rao SR, Shields AE et al. Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (4): 639-646. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1086
  7. Jones SS, Heaton P, Friedberg MW, Schneider EC. Today’s ‘meaningful use’ standard for medication orders by hospitals may save few lives; later stages may do more. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30(10): 2005-2012.
  8. McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S. The effect of health information technology o quality in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (4): 647-654. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0155
  9. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small, SD et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995; 274 (1): 29-34. DOI:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033
  10. Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27 (10): 509-521.
  11. Zlabek JA, Wickus JW, Mathiason MA. Early cost and safety benefits of an inpatient electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (2): 169-172. DOI:10.1136/jamia.2010.007229
  12. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. A systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293 (10): 1223-1238. DOI:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223
  13. Dexheimer JW, Talbot TR, Sanders DL, Rosenbloom ST, Aronsky D. Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (3): 311-320. DOI:10.1197/jamia.M2555
  14. American Hospital Association. 2008 Hospital EHR Adoption Database [supplement to FY2007 AHA Annual Survey Database]. Chicago: Health Forum, 2009.
  15. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360 (16): 1628-1638. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa0900592
  16. Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital Compare. http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/staticpages/for-professionals/poc/data-collection.aspx. Accessed May 1, 2011.
  17. US Department of Health and Human Services 'Hospital Compare: Information for Professionals on Data Collection'. \http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/staticpages/for-professionals/poc/data-collection.aspx. Accessed 10/20/11.
  18. The Joint Commission (TJC). 2010 ORYX Performance Measure Reporting Guidelines for Hospitals and Guidelines for Measure Selections. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/2010_ORYX_Performance_Measure_Reporting_Requirements.pdf. Accessed 02/21/12.
  19. U.S Department of Health and Human Services ‘Hospital Compare: Technical Appendix’. http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/staticpages/for-professionals/poc/technical-appendix.aspx. Accessed 02/21/12.
  20. Blumenthal D, DesRoches C, Donelan K, et al. Health information technology in the United States: the information base for progress. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2006.

You may also be interested in...

1.
Leveraging Information Technology Towards Enhancing Patient Care and a Culture of Safety in the U.S. *

M. J. Ball (1), D. E. Garets (2), T. J. Handler (3)

Methods Inf Med 2003 42 5: 503-508

2.
Development of an Automated, Real Time Surveillance Tool for Predicting Readmissions at a Community Hospital

Research Article

R. Gildersleeve (1), P. Cooper (1)

Appl Clin Inform 2013 4 2: 153-169

http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2012-12-RA-0058

3.
Monitoring Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices

A Method to Utilize HL7 Messages from Hospital Information Systems

Research Article

R. Konrad (1), B. Tulu (1), M. Lawley (2)

Appl Clin Inform 2013 4 1: 126-143

http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2012-06-RA-0026



Special Interest

 

Follow us...

 

 



Start the Presentation