![]() |
|
Research Article
A. E. Carroll (1, 2), V. Anand (1, 2), S. M. Downs (1, 2)
(1) Children’s Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; (2) The Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis, IN
Introduction: The identification of key factors influencing responses to prompts and reminders within a computer decision support system (CDSS) has not been widely studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate why clinicians routinely answer certain prompts while others are ignored.Methods: We utilized data collected from a CDSS developed by our research group – the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system. The main outcome of interest was whether a clinician responded to a prompt.Results: This study found that, as expected, some clinics and physicians were more likely to address prompts than others. However, we also found clinicians are more likely to address prompts for younger patients and when the prompts address more serious issues. The most striking finding was that the position of a prompt was a significant predictor of the likelihood of the prompt being addressed, even after controlling for other factors. Prompts at the top of the page were significantly more likely to be answered than the ones on the bottom.Conclusions: This study detailed a number of factors that are associated with physicians following clinical decision support prompts. This information could be instrumental in designing better interventions and more successful clinical decision support systems in the future.
Screening, Clinical decision support systems, EMR, CHICA, prompts
| 1. | ||
Manuel Monreal1, Luis Peidro2, Carlos Resines3, Carlos Garcés4, José Luís Fernández5, Eduardo Garagorri6, Juan Carlos González7, for the NETCOT Investigators* Thromb Haemost 2008 99 6: 1112-1115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH08-02-0115 | ||
| 2. | ||
M. Dietlein1, H. Wieler2, M. Schmidt1, R. Schwab3, P. E. Goretzki4, H. Schicha1 Nuklearmedizin 2008 47 2: 65-72 http://dx.doi.org/10.3413/nukmed-0125 | ||
| 3. | ||
Falk Thielemann, Jörg Ziegler, Klaus Peter Günther Kinder- und Jugendmedizin 2007 7 7: 371-378 | ||