Archive

Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9)

Journal: Applied Clinical Informatics
ISSN: 1869-0327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-11-RA-0070
Issue: Vol. 3: Issue 2 2012
Pages: 164-174

Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9)

Research Article

Supplementary file

P. D. Stetson (1, 2), S. Bakken (1, 3), J. O. Wrenn (4), E. L. Siegler (5)

(1) Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University; (2) Department of Medicine, Columbia University; (3) School of Nursing, Columbia University; (4) Department of Medical Informatics, Vanderbilt University; (5) Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Weill Cornell Medical College

Keywords

Documentation, quality, Electronic health record, note, instrument

Summary

Objective: To refine the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI) and test the validity and reliability of the 9-item version (PDQI-9).

Methods: Three sets each of admission notes, progress notes and discharge summaries were evaluated by two groups of physicians using the PDQI-9 and an overall general assessment: one gold standard group consisting of program or assistant program directors (n = 7), and the other of attending physicians or chief residents (n = 24). The main measures were criterion-related validity (correlation coefficients between Total PDQI-9 scores and 1-item General Impression scores for each note), discriminant validity (comparison of PDQI-9 scores on notes rated as best and worst using 1-item General Impression score), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)).

Results: The results were criterion-related validity (r = –0.678 to 0.856), discriminant validity (best versus worst note, t = 9.3, p = 0.003), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alphas = 0.87–0.94), and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.83, CI = 0.72–0.91).

Conclusion: The results support the criterion-related and discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability, and inter-rater reliability of the PDQI-9 for rating the quality of electronic physician notes. Tools for assessing note redundancy are required to complement use of PDQI-9. Trials of the PDQI-9 at other institutions, of different size, using different EHRs, and incorporating additional physician specialties and notes of other healthcare providers are needed to confirm its generalizability.

You may also be interested in...

1.

Steven G. Johnson (1), Stuart Speedie (1); Gyorgy Simon (1), Vipin Kumar (2), Bonnie L. Westra (1,3)

Appl Clin Inform 2017 8 4: 1012-1021

https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2017-03-RA-0042

2.
A Systematic Review on Quality Requirements

Review Article

A. Hoerbst (1), E. Ammenwerth (2)

Methods Inf Med 2010 49 4: 320-336

https://doi.org/10.3414/ME10-01-0038

3.
An overview of current approaches from the US and Europe

Review

A. Hörbst (1), E. Ammenwerth (2)

Appl Clin Inform 2010 1 2: 149-164

https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2010-02-R-0009