Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Disease

Journal: Applied Clinical Informatics
ISSN: 1869-0327
Issue: Vol. 5: Issue 2 2014
Pages: 416-429

Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Disease

A Major Opportunity

Research Article

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

S. Wells (1, 2), R. Rozenblum (2), A. Park (2), M. Dunn (3), D. W. Bates (2, 3)

(1) Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; (2) Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; (3) Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts


Electronic health records, personal health records, Adoption, chronic disease


Background: Personal health records (PHRs) connected to a physician’s electronic health record system hold substantial promise for supporting and engaging patients with chronic disease.

Objectives: To explore how U.S. health care organizations are currently utilizing PHRs for chronic disease populations.

Methods: A mixed methods study including semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire was conducted. A purposive sample was developed of health care organizations which were recognized as exemplars for PHRs and were high performers in national patient satisfaction surveys (H-CAHPS or CAHPS). Within each organization, participants were health IT leaders or those managing high-risk or chronic disease populations.

Results: Interviews were conducted with 30 informants and completed questionnaires were received from 16 organizations (84% response rate). Most PHRs allowed patients to access health records and educational material, message their provider, renew prescriptions and request appointments. Patient generated data was increasingly being sought and combined with messaging, resulted in greater understanding of patient health and functioning outside of the clinic visit. However for chronic disease populations, there was little targeted involvement in PHR design and few tools to help interpret and manage their conditions beyond those offered for all. The PHR was largely uncoupled from high risk population management interventions and no clear framework for future PHR development emerged.

Conclusion: This technology is currently underutilized and represents a major opportunity given the potential benefits of patient engagement and shared decision making. A coherent patient-centric PHR design and evaluation strategy is required to realize its potential and maximize this natural hub for multidisciplinary care co-ordination.

You may also be interested in...

A cross-sectional pilot study

Research Article

P. Azad Khaneghah (1), A. Miguel-Cruz (1, 2), P. Bentley (3), L. Liu (1), E. Stroulia (4), M. Ferguson-Pell (3)

Appl Clin Inform 2016 7 2: 573-586


Case Report

B. H. Crotty (1, 2), A. Mostaghimi (2, 3), J. O'Brien (1), A. Bajracharya (1, 2), C. Safran (1, 2), B. E. Landon (2, 4)

Appl Clin Inform 2015 6 2: 375-382


Section 7: Education and Consumer Health Informatics


D. Z. Sands (1, 2, 3), J. S. Wald (2, 4, 3)

Yearb Med Inform 2014 : 170-176