Advertisement

Archive

Mind the Gap

Journal: Applied Clinical Informatics
ISSN: 1869-0327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105
Issue: Vol. 7: Issue 4 2016
Pages: 1069-1087

Mind the Gap

A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation

Review

R. Ratwani (1), T. Fairbanks (1), E. Savage (1), K. Adams (1), M. Wittie (2), E. Boone, A. Hayden, J. Barnes (3), Z. Hettinger (1), A. Gettinger (2)

(1) National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington D.C.; (2) Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, Washington D.C.; (3) User-View, Raleigh, North Carolina

Keywords

implementation, Electronic health records, usability, Safety, human factors

Summary

Objective: Decisions made during electronic health record (EHR) implementations profoundly affect usability and safety. This study aims to identify gaps between the current literature and key stakeholders’ perceptions of usability and safety practices and the challenges encountered during the implementation of EHRs.

Materials and Methods: Two approaches were used: a literature review and interviews with key stakeholders. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify usability and safety challenges and best practices during implementation. A total of 55 articles were reviewed through searches of PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. We used a qualitative approach to identify key stakeholders’ perceptions; semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse set of health IT stakeholders to understand their current practices and challenges related to usability during implementation. We used a grounded theory approach: data were coded, sorted, and emerging themes were identified. Conclusions from both sources of data were compared to identify areas of misalignment.

Results: We identified six emerging themes from the literature and stakeholder interviews: cost and resources, risk assessment, governance and consensus building, customization, clinical workflow and usability testing, and training. Across these themes, there were misalignments between the literature and stakeholder perspectives, indicating major gaps. Discussion: Major gaps identified from each of six emerging themes are discussed as critical areas for future research, opportunities for new stakeholder initiatives, and opportunities to better disseminate resources to improve the implementation of EHRs.

Conclusion: Our analysis identified practices and challenges across six different emerging themes, illustrated important gaps, and results suggest critical areas for future research and dissemination to improve EHR implementation.

You may also be interested in...

1.

Section 2: Human Factors and Organizational Issues

Working Group Contribution

A. Kushniruk (1, 2), C. Nohr (2), E. Borycki (1)

Yearb Med Inform 2016 : 120-125

https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-024

2.

Section 5: Decision Support

Survey

E. Coiera (1), J. Ash (2), M. Berg (3)

Yearb Med Inform 2016 : 163-169

https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-014

3.

Section 2: Human Factors and Organizational Issues

Synopsis

S. Pelayo (1), R. Santos (2)

Yearb Med Inform 2016 : 126-129

https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-043